Integrated assessment of Prescribed burning

Prescribed burn - grass fire Shelford Victoria

The aims of this project are to provide integrated assessment of various prescribed burning strategies, and to quantify trade-offs between social and environmental outcomes from various prescribed burning strategies. Prescribed burning is likely to have both positive and negative impacts. It is inherently risky and requires expert management in planning and execution. There are potential adverse outcomes for the environment, and potential health and safety risks for the community. On the other hand, there can be offsetting benefits for life and property by reducing the risk of catastrophic fires. The challenge is to quantify these pros and cons appropriately for different circumstances, to weigh them up and quantify trade-offs.

Related news

Replay the Paying the Price online forum
The Paying the Price online forum, part of the Research to Drive Change series, is now available for replay.
Register for Paying the Price online forum now
Join leading researchers and industry representatives in interactive discussion for the Paying the Price online forum on Tuesday 17 June at 12:30pm, part of our Research To Drive Change series.
Photo - Anthony Clark, NSW RFS
Knowing which risk-mitigation strategies provide the best value for money is potentially of great benefit to fire managers facing significant resource-allocation challenges.
An evaluation of research in Australian universities with the highest impact has placed projects with Bushfire CRC links at the very top of the scale.