Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre
  • Print page
  • Text smaller
  • Text larger
  • Sitemap

All Content © Bushfire CRC 2007

Bushfire CRC > Research > Protection of People and Property > Safe Behaviour and Decision Making
Safe Behaviour and Decision Making | Public Documents | Members Documents |

D 2.3 Safe Behaviour and Decision Making

D23 - decision makingFirefighting, despite heavy reliance on fire prediction, hazard models, fire control and suppression technologies, is ultimately a human activity. It requires individual firefighters to form risk assessments and initiate courses of action.

It requires individual firefighters to form risk assessments and initiate courses of action. Firefighter safety, both in bushfire situations and in associated brigade activities, therefore requires that individuals be aware of, and give adequate attention to, the safety implications of any decisions they might implement.

Previous research suggests that human decision-making ability deteriorates in rapidly changing and relatively unpredictable situations such as a bushfire. It is unclear, however, precisely what factors cause such a decline in decision-making ability, particularly with regard to threats to safety.

The research to be undertaken by the La Trobe University team in collaboration with firefighting agencies, aims to increase the understanding of the human factors affecting decision making that could compromise safety on the fireground. Human factors include the effects of physical and mental stress, group pressures at crew and agency level, and the firefighters’ own thought processes.

Project researchers will interview senior officers of fire agencies and firefighter associations to determine perceived research needs, carrying out detailed post-incident debriefings of firefighting personnel (across all levels of rank) who are involved in incidents, conduct controlled experimentation using computer-generated safety threats (using Networked Fire Chief), and develop and test methods for presenting fire related information and for training to reduce safety-compromising behaviour.

In the first stage of the project 33 firefighters, ranging from crew leaders to incident controllers, were interviewed over summer of 2004/2005 after large-scale wildfires and prescribed fires. Some interesting trends are emerging from these interviews.

The findings from the interviews and subsequent experiments will greatly improve fire agencies’ ability to amend/develop processes and to train their firefighters, and so increase the likelihood of ‘safe’ decisions, particularly under stress.

Decision making team

Project Leader: Mary Omodei, LaTrobe University, Ph: (03) 9479-1747