Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre
  • Print page
  • Text smaller
  • Text larger
  • Sitemap

All Content © Bushfire CRC 2007

Bushfire CRC > Education > Current Students - Research Projects > Program D Students > Worst case scenarios: Their role in safe decision making in bushfire fighting

Claire Johnson, PhD, La Trobe

Worst case scenarios: Their role in safe decision making in bushfire fighting

This research attempts to understand the use of worst case scenarios in decision making. There is evidence that more effective decision makers consider worst cases in planning and situation assessment. Worst cases may be overlooked because they seem so unlikely, but this can lead to serious mistakes and disastrous outcomes.

Fire fighters are familiar with worst cases and know that minimising them is likely to increase safety. Thinking about worst cases is an exercise in imagination: You need to imagine possibilities, as well as estimate probabilities. In the bushfire fighting domain, worst cases may involve death, serious injury or substantial loss of assets.

Through incident report analysis, targeted interviews and investigation into training practices and procedures, this research will develop a greater understanding of how worst cases can improve decision making by bushfire fighters. By developing training recommendations for fire agencies that are tailored to complement existing structures, this research will improve safety in decision making.

Claire Johnson FIRECONFDAY2143

Documents

Claire Johnson
Worst case scenarios: How post-incident interviews have advanced current understanding [pdf 78.1 kb]


Claire Johnson (BCRC PhD Student), Geoff Cumming and Mary Omodei
Worst case scenarios in decision making. [pdf 68.4 kb]


The use of worst case scenarios in decision making by bushfire fighters
Research Poster, Bushfire CRC / AFAC Conference, Hobart, September 2007 [pdf 125.4 kb]


Contacts

Claire Johnson
PhD Student
La Trobe University